Because, if you gave it to Obama for doing absolutely
nothing other than not being George Bush, ya gotta give it to someone who
actually, you know, accomplished something that led to peace.
Could anyone reasonably argue if Kim Jong Un and Moon
Jae-in commenced their huggy love-ins five years ago Obama wouldn’t be touted
as the Peace Maker Wonder King of All Time for ending the seemingly never-ending
Korean War and possibly dragging the most despotic hell hole on Earth to
something that at least has the potential of joining modern civilization? Would
Obama, Blessed be His Name, not be on every single ballot cast by ever single
balloteer voting in Stockholm for the next Nobel Peace Prize Laureate?
You know the answer.
So that’s why they gotta give it to Trump.
Now, they never will, because he’s a Republican, and
he’s crude. I agree with the later part, but infinitely more loathsome
creatures were given a Peace Prize. Think of that reptilian Arafat for example.
They have to give it to him, but they won’t, at least
not to him solo. And perhaps they’re right. Give it to Kim Jong-un (ugh), Moon
Jae-in, Xi Jinping, and Trump, the whole quartet of ’em. That’d be a way to regain some credibility
after the Obama fiasco.
Trump may not have signed anything, may not have done
any of the legwork, may not have even been there. He may not know a single
historical thing about the conflict on the Korean peninsula. But could anyone
reasonably deny that if it wasn’t for our President’s, er, bloviating bluster, say,
the two Korean leaders would not know be hearting each other to pieces?
Give Trump the Nobel.
But they won’t.
It reminds me so much of Reagan when he deployed Pershing missiles in Europe. The rest of the world thought he was just a little bit crazy and acted much more cautiously than under "Doormat" Carter.
ReplyDeleteUncle