Well, I
failed in my third attempt to make it through Isaac Asimov’s Foundation.
Guess it just wasn’t meant to be.
The book
is regarded as a classic; though, to be honest, I am not entirely sure why. But
it isn’t the first “classic” I haven’t been able to read. Heart of Darkness by
Joseph Conrad comes immediately to mind. Read it twice – once way back in high school
and again around 2011 or 2012. Neither time did I “get it”, neither time was I bowled
over in the presence of a masterpiece. It did absolutely nothing to me or for
me, much to my displeasure.
There are
lesser books that I wouldn’t label as “classic” which I tried to read several times
but just couldn’t complete. Books that may not mean anything to you, but at one
point or another (probably when first taking it off a bookstore shelf and
walking to the cashier) I considered it a potentially intriguing or perhaps
life-changing read. Books such as The Illuminatus Trilogy by Robert Anton
Wilson and My Big TOE by Thomas Campbell. By the way, TOE is an acronym
for ‘Theory of Everything,’ and in this book it involves everything from
mediation to reality to physics to transcendence.
Speaking
of physics, I’ve tried Roger Penrose’s Fashion, Faith and Fantasy in the New
Physics a couple of times. Despite an intuition that Penrose might hold the
key to what everything is made of (in light of the relative failure of string
theory), I have never made it more than 80 or so pages in until brain ache
occurs. This silly topic of the building blocks of matter fascinated me to no
end since a young lad. I went so far as three semesters in Seton Hall in a quest
to find such answers for myself many, many years ago. Ergo, the book still sits
on my bookshelf (actually, in my closet for some reason, along with that marked-up
Einstein biography). It will be cracked open again at some point.
Surprisingly,
Dickens has given me a hard time with, well, er, Hard Times. Also, The
Mystery of Edwin Drood. Both books I’ve tried and both books I’ve failed.
Dunno. Like the Penrose physics books, I will conquer them in the near future.
So why did
my third go-round with Foundation fall through? It wasn’t the old “everyone
in the future talks like a 1940s Brooklyn Jew” that nagged me in my other
Asimovian re-reads. I think it was simply that I found the story … forgive me …
dull and boring. There were no stakes. There were no compelling characters. The
futuristic science of “psycho-history” was not adequately explained, even with Star
Trek: The Next Generation mumbo jumbo. And while I am by no means a literary
feminist, the fact that the only female character in the first 120 pages was a
secretary with no lines just didn’t sit well.
It’s sad
to me that a great hero of my youth did not translate to my later adulthood. I loved
Asimov as a kid. That Christmas gift five-paperback pack I write about
often – The Bicentennial Man, Nine Tomorrows, The Caves of Steel, Pebble in
the Sky, and The Gods Themselves – along with I, Robot to
help sooth a young boy with a broken arm, and Fantastic Voyage the same
young boy bought in the Bookmobile, these books formed me and gave me hours of
reading pleasure, moreso than any author in my youth. Will I read any more
Asimov in this lifetime? Probably not. But I will enjoy those fond, nostalgic
memories.













