Friday, November 22, 2019

JFK



The JFK assassination … 56 years ago today.

I first became aware of it sometime around 5th grade or so. Must’ve been 1978, 79. It was one of those SRA kits we had to do back then. An SRA kit was a big box of about a hundred laminated cards the size of a regular sheet of paper. Each card contained a mini-article or a short story that sequentially got more difficult, harder and harder, as you progressed through them. You read through them, answered questions, and every now and then the teacher moved you up a level. Memory is vague, but I believe my first encounter with the events of November 22, 1963 was from one of those cards.

Then nothing for twelve or thirteen years. Oliver Stone’s JFK came out around Christmas 1991, and I saw it with pals and girlfriends in the theaters. It intrigued me, me who knew little of it as back then I was in the thick of my musician / band phase, and I rarely had time to crack a book (and if I did, it was of the horror King – Koontz variety).

Then again nothing for six more years till, one Memorial Day weekend, stood up by friends, I found myself alone doing laundry at my parents’ house. My stepfather had some books on the assassination, and on a whim I cracked one open. (Six Seconds in Dallas, by Josiah Thompson.) I was riveted, and read through the other two or three he had until the wee hours of the morning.

Then again nothing for nine years, till the bizarre fascination returned with a vengeance. From about 2006 to 2011 I bought a dozen or so books on the assassination and read or skimmed through them all. Not sure why, exactly, but I was taken in with the immensity of the alleged conspiracy. The little micro discrepancies as well as the big picture stuff. Like my childhood interest in Squatch and aliens and the paranormal, I was never a true believer, but I enjoyed the creepy campiness of what I was reading.

Then, in 2011, I read Gerald Posner’s book on the assassination and chased it with chunks of Vincent Bugliosi’s. Both men are firmly in the Lone Gunman camp, and both wrote with precision, power and passion and I was persuaded.

But I still appreciate a good conspiracy now and then.

Over the years I’ve posted a bunch of stuff on the topic here at the Hopper:



And yesterday’s entry into the labyrinth, White SuitConspiracy.


I think I’ll follow up this post with a list. Bloggers like lists! I like lists! I think I’ll list the best books on the JFK Assassination I’ve read, for those who may be interested in dipping a toe in the water or comparing notes …

Stay tuned.

Wednesday, November 20, 2019

White Suit Conspiracy



OK, I was slumming for a few days. I read a Jesse Ventura book on the JFK assassination. For those in the know, it was slightly closer to reality than the Jim Marrs book Oliver Stone used as background for JFK. But only slightly. Ventura’s book details 63 reasons to believe the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. Much was interesting, much was a rehash of the stuff I read during my JFK heyday a decade ago, and a lot was straight out of left field. It was a quick read, finished in about three hours.

It did mention a new take on small part of the assassination, one thing I had never read or heard before. I don’t believe it for a moment, but it struck me as intriguing.

Remember the assassination of Lee Harvey Oswald in the basement of the Dallas Police Department? He’s escorted out, handcuffed to a detective, into the midst of what seems to be a mob of a hundred men. One lurches forward, a nightclub owner name of Jack Ruby, a man who has absolutely no business in the basement of the Dallas Police Department, and fires a bullet at close range right into Oswald’s abdomen. The alleged presidential assassin dies an hour and 45 minutes later at Parkland Hospital, the same hospital that attempted to save Kennedy.

According to Ventura (or a source in his book, can’t remember which), all the men are wearing dark suits and hats except for one. One man is in a white suit and hat, and he’s the man cuffed to Oswald. The theory states that Ruby was sent in to kill Oswald and would recognize his victim because he would be to the right of the man in the white suit and hat.

Creepy. But I don’t think it’s true.

Take a look at this photo taken the instant Ruby fires at Oswald:




Yes, the detective next to Oswald wears what appears to be a white suit and hat (some describe it as “tan”). But in this picture I can see two guys with white/tan hats, one next to Oswald and the other immediately behind him, and at the right-side edge maybe another man with a white/tan suit. So perhaps this micro-conspiracy is a little half-baked.

But boy does that detective in the white suit and hat stand out.


Thursday, November 14, 2019

Godzilla: King of the Monsters





© 2019

One major part of my life growing up in the 70s, between the ages of, say, eight and ten, was Godzilla. The original Japanese gorilla-whale. How I loved Godzilla as a kid! From the murky, mature, somewhat adult original Godzilla of 1951 to the acid-rock 1971 Godzilla vs the Smog Monster to all those silly “monster island” movies with baby Godzilla, aliens with funky sunglasses and mecha-monsters such as Mecha-Godzilla and Mecha-Kong. My all-time favorite, which I still watch every couple of years when it’s on regular TV, is 1963’s Godzilla vs. King Kong. Every Saturday morning there’d be a Godzilla flick on, and WABC channel 7 would play a Godzilla-themed week several times a year as their 4:30 movie.

So, a half-dozen years ago, the little boy in me was quite excited when it was announced that a “real” revisioning of Godzilla was coming out. Forget that 1997 Roland Emmerich mistake. This time, though made by an American studio, this new Godzilla would be phenomenal and iconic.

Well, I reviewed that piece of garbage here. My wounded inner child graded it a C-minus.

Then, two years ago, that damn little kid got all worked up again over the Godzilla sequel, where the King of the Monsters would prove he was, uh, king of the monsters by kicking the combined asses of Ghidora, Rodan, and Mothra.

I was more than willing to forgive them for 2014.

Then, last week, I watched Godzilla: King of the Monsters.

I hated it. Hated, hated, hated it.

But not in an emotional way. More in an existential way. Not as in, “why does this movie exist?” Yes, we all know, to cash in on the hopes and dreams of middle-aged men who grew up on Godzilla decades ago, and also on their CGI-indoctrinated children. But as I watched the flick I was blanketed with a Satrian sense of ennui. Boredom. Existential boredom, where I questioned my own existence. Why was I watching this film? What did I do wrong? Where did I go wrong? Was I being punished for something? If existence precedes essence, why the hell is this sentient entity stretched out in his favorite comfy chair munching on his daughters’ Halloween candy doing watching this wretched excuse for cinema?

I had to take my revenge.

Therefore, I did something I never did before. Before the movie was over, around the halfway point, in fact, I reached for pad and pen and began taking notes on everything that I despised about and disappointed me with this movie.

In no particular order –


– Fat Godzilla’s back. Man, is he huge. More whale than gorilla. BMI greater than the number of Tokyo elderly. It was literally embarrassing to watch him on the screen. All jokes aside, fat monsters are not intimidating. How frightened were you of Jabba the Hut?

– Blurry CGI. Every special effect is seen either in the rain, or through a dust cloud, or at night, or on a TV screen in the movie, or through a camera lens. I know it’s to hide the cheap shoddiness of the final product. It annoyed me early on and all the way through.

– Roller-coaster camera work / camera never stands still. This is perhaps the number one thing I despise about movies today. I’m dizzy after ten minutes of any movie made after the Bourne Identity movies. It’s all shaky cam, even a Godzilla movie. I watched LA Confidential while I was laid up with a sprained ankle this past weekend and the static, unmoving camera work amazed me. I could enjoy the dialogue, the plot developments, the action, on a placid screen without reaching for a barf bag.

– Color-washed film with drab colors. Ugh. Why must the entire movie be various shades and hues of blue? Or sepia? Is it to instill a sense of unreality in the viewer? Not this one. It just took me out of the film entirely.

– Un-scary monster roars. Another peeve of mine. Monster roars are not scary. This goes even for Jurassic Park. Every flick with a monster bigger than a man has to have it roar at 110 decibels. Not scary. Godzilla’s roar is iconic. It is not scary.

– Unrealistic diversity and Mary Sues. Know what a “Mary Sue” is? Google it if you don’t. As soon as I saw the bald 105-point hit woman – the bad guy’s right-hand-man – I began counting all the diversity checkmarks in this film.

– Technically proficient teen daughter cliché. This was a cliché way back in 1993 with Jurassic Park. Teen girls don’t do Information Technology. Sorry, feminists and beta comic book fans. I have two daughters, fifteen and eleven, and though they could work their iPhones in a sandstorm during a midnight apocalypse, they laugh at computer nerds. So do their friends.

– Monsters still second fiddle to humans. This was not as bad as the first movie, where Godzilla was only seen in the background on TV screens in the film, but it was still bad. No one cares about the scientist family. The audience of this movie wanted to see 250-foot tall monsters beating the hell out of each other.

– Obligatory self-sacrifice scene with operatic dirge. This was just schmaltzy. Plus, I am not quite sure the sacrificee had to be sacrificed. But by that point I was completely out of the movie, and probably missed some important detail. Or maybe not.

– Something like ninety percent of the movie filmed before a green screen (background effects digitally added). Nothing seemed real. Everything looked kinda fakey-fake. I wouldn’t be surprised even if the kitchen scenes were done in a green-screen studio.


I do not hate you, Godzilla: King of the Monsters. That would imply much more enthusiasm than I have for you. No, you simply underwhelmed me and wasted two hours and twelve minutes of my life.

Grade: D.


N.B. They’ve been teasing a Godzilla versus King Kong remake, and Kong actually had a two-second cameo (on a video screen, natch, in a military war room) in the movie. Please hold me to this vow not to see that sure atrocity when it arrives in three-to-five years!

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

First Snowfall



If you want to call it that. Here in NE New Jersey temps are in the high 30s and its rainy and the media is frothing up a panic over the possibility that, for maybe ten minutes or so, actual snow might fall from the sky, which we all know will melt upon landing.





Monday, November 11, 2019

Mathematician Discipline



Q: How did the mathematician scold his child?

A: “If I told you n times, I’ve told you n + 1 times …”


Joke courtesy of Patch, trying to cheer up her clumsy dad recovering from an ankle sprain.


Sunday, November 10, 2019

Ankle Sprain



So I got up early yesterday feeling energetic. I stretched, did a brisk 2-set 10-exercise weight workout, showered, changed, gathered up the dry cleaning and the due library books, and headed out the front door. The little ones were in Texas, the wife was doing her own thing, and I was going to get some errands done. Recycling, Barnes and Noble, capped off with a trip to the Giant Farmer’s Fresh market for some incredibly delicious wings.

Then, I met the baby pumpkin. Rather, it met me.

Every Halloween season the wife likes to decorate our porch. We have a concrete porch of three steps. Each step is bookmarked with tiny baby pumpkins, each about the size of a baseball, and two big pumpkins guard either side of the front door. Well, yesterday was November 9, and we still had the pumpkins adorning the porch.

Also, apparently, we had some fierce windstorms the night before.

I rushed out the door with an armful of dress shirts and three cinder-block sized books. Closed the door behind me, took a first step down the porch and immediately my left ankle buckled inward. In the middle of the night the winds had blown a baby pumpkin into the middle of the stairs and I, vision blocked by too much stuff in my hands, failed to see it and stepped right on to it. It immediately went right and I went down to the left.

The pain was so intense and so quick I could do nothing but pitch forward down the remaining steps and wipe out on the lawn. Books and laundry went flying. I landed on my right shoulder and rolled forward.

My first thought was a broken ankle. I got on all fours and realized I couldn’t bear any weight on my left leg. I crawled up the stairs and burst into the living room, flopping on the ground. “Help me! I need help!” was all I could utter.

I laid on the floor for ten minutes while my heart slowed down. My wife put a pillow under my head, cleared off the single chair, pulled out the ottoman, and put some ice in a plastic bag.

For the next ten hours I sat in that chair, left leg raised, iced every two hours for twenty minutes. We watched Creed, L.A. Confidential, Daddy’s Home, Bundesliga soccer, The Wolverine. We did Door Dash for Chipotle for lunch, then some veggie lasagna from the oven for dinner. I found a four foot wooden dowel to use as a makeshift crutch to hobble from the chair to the bathroom every two hours.

What is wrong with the ankle? Well, I decided against a trip to the hospital. I can wiggle my left foot forward, rightward, and backward, but not to the left. The left side of the ankle is completely swollen. The pain is gone except when I put weight on it. The wife is going to the pharmacy later today to pick me up some crutches. If there is no improvement by Monday or Tuesday, I’ll go to the hospital, but I can’t see what they’ll do other than put me in a boot.

Now, however, I have some time to read and write guilt-free ...

Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Lost in the Woods




Charles Morse: You know, I once read an interesting book which said that, uh, most people lost in the wilds, they, they die of shame.

Stephen: What?

Charles Morse: Yeah, see, they die of shame. “What did I do wrong? How could I have gotten myself into this?” And so they sit there and they ... die. Because they didn’t do the one thing that would save their lives.

Robert Green: And what is that, Charles?

Charles Morse: Thinking.

- from The Edge, 1997 survival flick starring Anthony Hopkins


A favorite of mine. Just re-watched the movie the other day and introduced it to Little One. And it got me all retrospective. Hopper hasn’t really done any serious thinking in a long time. Goofy thinking, half-assed thinking, non- and un-serious thinking, sure. But real, serious, life-altering thinking? No, not for a long time. Not since 2015. Definitely not since 2015.

Perhaps it’s time to spend some time in thought …


Sunday, November 3, 2019

Infantile Mass



I thought I was doing a good thing this morning. I thought I was, really.

Wishing to get an early jump on the day’s activities and taking advantage of the extra hour we got due to the Daylight Savings thing, I showered upon waking, dressed, grabbed Patch (age eleven), and headed out the door to do a relatively-speaking early mass, the Nine A.M.

I forgot that the Nine A.M. mass at my Novus Ordo church is the “Family Mass.” Or, as Patch described it, the “Children’s Mass.” Or, as I’m going to describe it, the “Infantile Mass.”

First of all, as we sat down ten minutes before the start of mass, I knelt and tried to pray. But it was futile. A small group of young ’uns were loudly rehearsing a song off key. Adults – all rocking their finest pairs of jeans – shuffled in herding toddlers and babies, chatting animatedly to each other and in that overly-exaggerated way to the various youngsters they passed, all oblivious to the Presence of Christ in the tabernacle off to the side. I would have had better success praying in Grand Central Station. After a minute, I stopped.

The mass was said by the priest who had the lowest testosterone-to-estrogen ratio in the parish. A nice man, but not very manly. Everything was caterwauled by the half-dozen member choir, consisting of a sixth-grader my daughter knew from school, a fifth-grader, and four other younger children. Some elderly hippies on guitar and keyboards accompanied them.

The readings were done somewhat respectfully, though in that slower-than-molasses enunciate-every-word-monotonously Novus Ordo way I hate. Give me a televangelist any time over these zombified lectors. The gospel was on Jesus’s interaction with tax collector Zacheus, a perennial favorite the Church runs through every year. When my girls were younger a priest even brought out a Zacheus puppet for the homily.

Ah, that brings me to the homily. The old priest called up all the children from the pews – about two dozen – to sit on the stairs before the altar. Through a faulty mic that keeping cutting out he explained in excruciatingly simplistic detail the “moral” of the gospel reading, via a Q&A with the little ones. Basically, if you do bad, confess to God and make up for it in some way.

The Liturgy of the Eucharist veered back towards a normal, reverential mass, though I balked when I saw six Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion tromp up to the altar to help the priest distribute the Body and Blood to all ninety of us in the pews. I no longer serve as an EMHC as I cannot theologically justify the office of Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion. I told Patch to slip into the line feeding to the priest as it came our time to go forward.

Now, to defend myself, as you no doubt consider me a cold-hearted reactionary bastard.

I am not against children learning hymns (but please not those God-awful 70s abominations) and learning some basic lessons in morality and what our Church teaches. No, I am not against this at all. In fact, there should be a special place explicitly devoted to these goals. In fact, there is: Sunday School.

Mass is Mass. Mass is to honor the sacrifice Christ made for us on the Cross. Christ should be the center of the mass. After 1970, with the institution of the Novus Ordo mass, we became the center of the mass. In the “Family Mass,” the children became the center of the mass.

The priest no longer faces Christ on the Cross; he faces us. We no longer kneel and take the Eucharist on the tongue; we stand and take it via our unconsecrated hands. We no longer dress like we are in the presence of the Creator of the Universe; we dress like we’re going to watch a T-Ball game.

I observed the distracted faces of the parents as the mass went on. No one was focused on the readings or the prayers from the priest. Everyone was letting their precious ones climb all over the pews, noisily rip open bags of snacks, burble out loud and smack each other. There was the occasional “hush!” but no discipline at all. Only one grandma left the pews with her granddaughter, and that was to proudly escort her down the center aisle to use the bathroom.

I saw a lack of catechesis in those distracted faces. No one knew why he or she was there. Since 1970 there has been a dearth of catechesis to the “faithful.” Certainly very, very little from the pulpit. Ninety-nine percent of the sermons I hear are on some variation of “being nice.” I have never heard a sermon on the Church’s teaching on abortion, homosexuality, or any non-liberal cause (I did hear one on why the death penalty should be abolished).

It has been written that America worships a religion called Moralistic Therapeutic Deism. Go ahead, google it. What it means, basically, is that we want a religion that only demands we feel good about ourselves by being nice. The “deism” part is a non-personal God who demands nothing too strenuous of us.

We also are in full communion with Mammon. Mammon, meaning wealth or the pursuit of it. For who would dress in their best pair of jeans to go on a job interview? How many of us are too tired from a week of work to attend Mass on a precious day off? How many of us spend more annually at amazon.com than contribute to the Church or a charity?

Additionally, we commune with the god Athletica. Who would willingly allow our children to miss a practice or miss one of their games? Who would willingly allow our children to be late to a practice or game? Or allow distractions? How come I never see the coaches of both teams allow younger siblings on the field to play with them in a “Family Game”?

What is important to us? Work? Sports? Or worship of the True God?

Now, I admit, though I believe the truth of Catholicism, I disavow the current regime in the Vatican. I disavow the implementation of Vatican II. I disavow the “weaponized ambiguity” of the documents of Vatican II that allows such sillinesses as Clown Masses, Pachamamas, and Family Masses. And so, apparently, whether consciously or not, so do millions of others. Google any statistics on the numbers of Catholics, Catholic marriages, Priests, and Religious Orders, and you’ll see the downward trend. Since 1970 and the “reforms” after Vatican II, the Church has been in freefall.

This “Family Mass” is but one of many, many, many symptoms, and as the years go by and the numbers of faithful decline, nothing ever changes.