Monday, October 30, 2017

Book Review: Pickett's Charge: A microhistory



Pickett’s Charge: A microhistory of the final attack at Gettysburg, July 3, 1863




© 1959 by George R. Stewart (1895-1980)


First off, I like that term: microhistory. I’ve read history off and on for over twenty years now, and I don’t think I’ve ever read a “microhistory.” It appeals to me. Think of it: to know so much about a certain, limited period of time – an event suspended in the amber of time – to be an expert. That is what the author of this book, George Stewart, was. An expert. An authority.

The book chronicles “Pickett’s Charge,” the final assault on the union line on Day Three of the battle at Gettysburg. Robert E. Lee, aggressively invading the North for a second time in nine months, is seeking to destroy the Army of the Potomac, newly led by George Meade for all of three days. A victory for the South could very well lead to independence via foreign recognition or, not an unreasonable possibility, the utter destruction of Northern forces in the northeast. Harrisburg, Philadelphia – even Washington – would lay open undefended and at the rebels’ mercy.

On days one and two of the surprise confrontation, Lee attacked either flank of the Northern army. Picture two ridges, each running north-south, with about a mile between them, and a diagonal road running southwest to northeast within this plain. That’s the Gettysburg battlefield. The Union, holed up on the eastern ridge, is anchored at the north by Culp’s Hill, and in the south by Round Top and Little Round Top. Prior rebel attacks on both positions failed. Normally unpredictable, Lee now decides to attack the middle.

10,500 men in three divisions formed in several lines will march across the mile-long open plain for a timeless 20 minutes, braving artillery and rifle fire, to assault the Northern position. Though it was not distinctly Pickett’s to command (he was one of three commanders), history has labeled it “Pickett’s Charge.” It is the “high-water mark” of the South, for ultimately it failed, and the Rebellion was forced to fight a long, drawn-out, losing battle over the next 21 months.

Stewart divides the book into several large chapters:


Early Morning – Mostly Confederate

Later Morning – Mostly Union

Noon-day Lull

Between the Signal-shots

Cannonade

Second Lull

Advance

High-Water Mark

Repulse

Afterwards


Each takes a segment of the day and details, in short digestible bites, who was where with what: Generals, colonels, regiments, artillery batteries, defenses, headquarters. Then we enter the minds of the men, the leaders and the grunts behind the two-foot-high stone walls, those selected to “charge” into fire with fixed bayonets, the war councils, the dispatches between Longstreet (who had misgivings about the attack) and his various underlings. Meade’s correct guess where Lee’d attack. There’s lots of humor (a hog steals bread earmarked for the general’s lunch), lots of interesting tidbits and factoids (there was a Private George Stewart, no relation to the author, in the heat of the action). I found it page-turning, immensely intriguing, and the “microhistory” truly brings the battle to life in ways that larger works, for me, failed to do.

This book will stay on the shelf for a re-reading in the future. I may check out Stewart’s other diverse works as well. For instance, he wrote a post-apocalyptic novel in 1949 (before post-apocalyptic everything was done to death) that won the first International Fantasy Award. The novel, Earth Abides, was said by Stephen King to be an inspiration for The Stand.

Much as my previous Civil War read, If the South Won at Gettysburg, had something of substance to learn in its appendix, so does Pickett’s Charge. In the first, it was Civil War battlefield tactics, which I summarized in my review of that work. In Stewart’s microhistory, in the last chapter he details the grim “butcher’s bill,” which answers the question that had commonly popped into my mind, how do historians and the military quantify battlefield casualties?

Well, Stewart informs us of the following:


* Wounded should equal about four times the dead

* Killed / Total Casualties is approximately 17 percent (for the Civil War)

* In close fighting, the killed-to-total-casualty ratio is closer to 20 percent

* About 1 wounded man in 7 died later of his wounds

* Rule of thumb: 1 casualty in 12 credited to artillery fire


and not quite a statistical item, but one I found interesting due to other stuff I’ve read regarding the Civil War – at Gettysburg, there was not a single recorded instance of a man killed or wounded by a bayonet.


Grade: A-plus.



N.B. Numbered among the Confederate dead on the evening of July 3, 1863, was Private George Stewart of the 1st Tennessee.

Friday, October 27, 2017

Imagine X written by Y with a plot by Z


While listening to the radio during my commute the other morning, I heard the DJ do a live commercial for some new techno-thriller novel. This struck me as unusual. Though I’ve heard books promoted via commercial on the AM radio waves before, it hasn’t been too frequent. Part of the copy near the end read something like: “Imagine Catch-22 written by Hunter S. Thompson with a plot by Tom Clancy!”

Wow.

That’s “wow” in a “hmmmm” sense.

Seems to me the publisher is trying to gin up interest in the somewhat generically-titled book by making us think that THIS IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT. I don’t begrudge them that. I found the variables Catch-22, Hunter S. Thompson, and Tom Clancy to be intriguing, in fact, though I also, in fact, doubt the book is entirely a mashup of the three.

Anyway, that got me thinking.

See that book there to the right? My toe-dip into the waters of Kindle entitled Oncewhere Walked the Whale? How could I describe my magnum opus? How would a mythical publisher do so in a radio commercial?

How ’bout …


“Imagine The Iliad written by Jorge Luis Borges with a plot by J.R.R. Tolkien!”

“Imagine Breaking Bad written by Walt Whitman with a plot by Franz Kafka!”

“Imagine Atlas Shrugged written by Norman Vincent Peale with a plot by Dr. Seuss!”

“Imagine Moby Dick written by Kurt Vonnegut with a plot by George Orwell!”

or even

“Imagine The New Testament written by Robert Heinlein with a plot by John Le Carre!”


OK, confession time. I wrote down the first distinctive authors and books (and a TV show) that came to my mind and randomly paired them all up. It took about three minutes. Kinda fun. And, startlingly enough, they either describe my book perfectly to a T or have absolutely entirely nothing to do with it. It’s all up to you. In your mind.

Or is it?


Thursday, October 26, 2017

The Starter Wage


I’m just gonna float this on out. Haven’t heard it out there in that Matrix-like level of reality known as the Mainstream Media. Or any media, for that matter. If it’s been addressed or proposed somewhere by someone else some time ago and it’s flown straight by me, forgive my lapse of attention.

Anyway, I was thinking about all this “raise-the-minimum-wage-to-$15-an-hour” nonsense and came up with an idea. Now, please don’t get offended, but it seems to me that logical, rational thinking people can understand that when costs go up, demand goes down. The more expensive something is, the fewer people will want to pay for it. Labor is a cost to business. When government mandates a minimum cost and then raises it, businesses will look for other means to fulfill the demand they once had for that labor when that labor was at a lower cost. Such as automation, as we’re seeing some fast food restaurants experiment with.

Common sense. Or, better yet, self-interest. It has nothing to do with “fairness”, if one defines “fairness” as equality of results. A market of buyers and sellers all looking out for their own self-interests yields an efficient marketplace. “Efficiency” as defined as equality of opportunity. Yet a third of the general public out there won’t understand that line of reasoning and another third will actively endorse and promote contrary ideas. So, thus, we have the government interfering in the marketplace in the holy name of Fairness.

Now, if – and it’s a huuuuuuuge if – IF government absolutely must get involved in the private sector by mandating a minimum wage, a minimum cost of labor, fine and good. Continue as planned, amateur Keynesians, and keep marching toward utopia and try not to get too many people unemployed, or at least blame business for acting in their own self-interest for increased-minimum-wage-related unemployment.

But I have two young daughters. One will be looking for work in two or three years. Part-time, first-time, summer job type work. In order to have her find a job (mostly for the experience), since no employer will pay an inexperienced teen $15/hour, why not create a new category of employee: the starter worker, with a starter worker wage.

We can even capitalize the words in the title. The Starter Worker, with the Starter Worker Wage. We can also super-complicate it, over-define and over-regulate it as government is wont to do. We can set limits, such as: the Starter Worker must be currently attending a secondary school full-time. Or the Starter Worker must not work more than 500 hours a year. Or the Starter Worker must be under the age of 18 by December 31st of the current year. You know, give businesses a lot of tracking busywork to do since government is generously allowing them to hire an inexperienced kid living with mom and dad at $8 an hour.

The Starter Worker Wage.

Has it been proposed, and I missed it? If it hasn’t, why not?

Signed,

Hopper
Armchair Economist