Saturday, February 29, 2020

February in Review



Well, some good, some bad.

The bad: I overexerted myself towards the end of January with all the walking and lifting, and exhaustion set in. A deep fatigue which I couldn’t shake, so I laid off the walking and lifting. A week, and then, before I knew it, a whole month, and any weight loss strides I made were soon confined to the dustbin of history. Once the exercising ended, so did the healthy eating.

However, the good: About two weeks ago one of those beautiful rare bolts from the blue bullseyed me and I was granted a renewed raison d’etra, something I’d been seeking out over the last four years. I’m going to give a go at historical fiction. A new novel. I have a setting, characters, plot, a rough outline. I’ve researched it over these past fourteen days and feel confident and excited. I’ve even given myself a deadline: my birthday, September 17.

Tomorrow being the first of March, I’m going to go out for a walk first thing in the a.m. Get back on that horse. Throw the weights around a bit while doing the laundry in the afternoon. And then write a thousand words while the wife and the girls bathe our incredibly stinky dog Charlie.

February is gone. Long live February! Onward to March, and to a new springtime!



Monday, February 24, 2020

Book Review: The Monstrumologist



Looking to reward myself for having, so far, a great 2020, I browsed the shelves at the local used book store hoping something would leap out at me. And boy, did something ever: The Monstrumologist.

Normally, I’m not taken in by a book’s cover. I hate 99.9 percent of all the book covers I’ve ever seen, save for those funky mid-70s psychedelic sci fi paperbacks I cut my literary teeth on. But this cover intrigued me: early 17th and 18th century anatomical drawings buried under oppressive coloration and blood splatters. What wasn’t to love?

I instantly bought and then read it over the course of the next week. And even before I finished it I motored back to that store and purchased up the other three books in the series.

Now I know little of the author Rick Yancey, and I’m keeping it that way. I also know little of the Monstrumologist series, and ditto. I am so enjoying this ride that I do not want any outside influences to tilt or totter it one way or another.

So, what’s a “monstrumologist” and what did I think of the book?





A monstrumologist is one who studies, and subsequently deals with, monsters.

Yay!

The monstrumologist in question is one Doctor Pellinore Warthrop, a bachelor renaissance man flourishing in the late 19th century. 1890, to be specific, I think. The story is told through the eyes of young orphan Will Henry, who is the good doctor’s apprentice. During the course of the 400-page novel, we shadow the duo through a handful of set pieces and interactions with other colorful characters.

The featured monster has historical weight to it, and one that seems to have been forgotten by our culture: headless anthropoids with razor sharp hooks for hands, a gaping toothy maw where a man’s stomach normally sits, and merciless unthinking shark eyes at each shoulder. I nearly read of such creatures four years ago when I perused (but did not finish) the Histories of Herodotus, written in 440 BC. Other ancient travelogues and histories mention them, mostly as inhabitants of the African coast.

All I really do know of the series is that they’re aimed at the “young adult” market, whatever that is, and after reading it, I would not want the two young adults who live with me (ages fifteen and eleven) reading it. It is violent. It is gory. If it was filmed, it would be one of those NC-17 deals until the studio cut a handful of seconds of blood here and there. It was much more gory that I first expected, extremely gory, Walking Dead gory.

Which, if I may add with a touch of guilt, I kinda liked. I haven’t read such grossness in decades, probably since my late-80s early-90s Clive Barker phase. But this was of a different caliber of gore – clinical gore, which somehow is so much worse.

There were passing references to true historical characters in the story, which I also enjoyed. Mason and Slidell, the two men taken off the Trent during the Civil War which nearly sparked a war with England, were somewhat maligned as being, possibly, dealbrokers to bring these headless monstrosities to American shores. And a passing veiled reference to Jack the Ripper – which I caught pages and pages before the characters in the story! – was very nicely done and set up potential conflict in other books downseries.

My only beef was that I felt it was a little two wordy. Though there was lots and lots of action, there seemed to be lots and lots of unnecessary exposition, too. But this is a minor complaint. A lot of the exposition and the dialogue went into fleshing out the relationship between the doctor – who in the eye of my mind is a persnickety twerp a la Bertrand Russell – and young Will Henry. The orphan in over his head, hurting from the horrifying loss of his parents, seeking love, affection, and affirmation from a man simply incapable of giving it – or is he? I will continue reading the series to see how their relationship grows, as each character does grow over the course of the novel.

Grade: solid A.

In the next book, which I hope to get to in the spring, the doctor and Will Henry travel into the woods to investigate the entity known as the wendigo …


Tuesday, February 18, 2020

One Jailbird's Distilled Summation



“In Rome, I had nearly five thousand volumes in my library. By reading and re-reading them, I discovered that one hundred and fifty books, carefully chosen, give you, if not a complete summation of human knowledge, at least everything that is useful for a man to know. I devoted three years of my life to reading and re-reading these hundred and fifty volumes, so that when I was arrested I knew them more or less by heart. In prison, with a slight effort of memory, I recalled the entirely. So I can recite to you Thucydides, Xenophon, Plutarch, Livy, Tacitus, Strada, Jornades, Dante, Montaigne, Shakespeare, Spinoza, Machiavelli and Bossuet; I mention only the most important …”

- The Count of Monte Cristo, chapter XVI


I love when novels get meta!

And I immediately interpreted this as a challenge!

These words, spoken by a man imprisoned for a decade, rung out to me. I have fantasized elsewhere in these electronic pages what I’d do with a long life sentence, and I’ve often rhapsodized about reading, books read, and bucket lists of works not yet conquered. So, naturally, I have to think about all the writings I have consumed (around eleven hundred cover-to-cover, by a rough count).

Now, this man, Abbe Faria, has read 4.54 more books than I. Therefore, my distillation must be of a similarly proportioned magnitude. Challenge: Can I extract 33 books that would be, “if not a complete summation of human knowledge, at least everything that is useful for a man to know.” Or, rather, a complete summation of Hopper knowledge, that devoted Hopperites of either sex would find useful.

Challenge accepted!

More later … if I do not go insane in the process.