The Crystal Cave © 1970 by Mary Stewart
The Hollow Hills © 1973 by Mary Stewart
One of my more perverse literary habits is to periodically
revisit memorable books from my past. My distant, idealized, youthful past.
Books that thrilled me and chilled me as a child, books that colored my
black-and-white world, books that breathed pneuma
into the sails of my life, sweeping me beyondward to distant lands and
distant peoples.
I say “perverse” because, more often than not, such
revisits often rebound with regret. The book does not live up to my memories of
it – a strict function of the fact that I am now solidly adult, and see the
world through the pragmatic and dour eyes of a mature man. The awe and glee of
a child’s glance rarely sits with me during today’s literary wanderings, and it
is the hope of recapturing such awe and glee that prompts me ever to the next
book.
However, not all is personal, private tragedy when I
return to a Book from my Childhood. I’ve read The Lord of the Rings twice now since tweenhood, and each time it
has grown stronger and brighter and more meaningful to me. Same can be said for
Watership Down and some Asimov novels
recently re-read. In fact, off the top of my head, I’ll throw out the guestimate
that one in three books I revisit from my youth exceeds my starry-eyed memories.
It’s those other two-thirds that populate my literary masochistic streak.
I don’t remember when first I read Mary Stewart’s The Crystal Cave and The Hollow Hills, but I do believe it
was those murky months after my parents divorced and my mother, brother and I
moved into our first apartment. Tolkien gave me much comfort in the initial
stages of their separation, and that was the summer before Freshman year at
high school. So perhaps the Stewart books followed a year later, because they
were assigned summer reading. Or maybe I read them directly after The Lord of the Rings. Either way, I had
to read them.
But they were right up my alley back then: Merlin.
Merlin, and Arthur.
Now, I haven’t the time or the inclination to test my
theory, but to my mind it seems these books were the first to re-image classic,
traditional tales of myth and legend. The story is told from Merlin’s point of
view, beginning at the innocent age of six and ending with the wizard coming
full into his powers, at age thirty-five or so, with the ascendency of his
ward, Arthur. Nowadays, reimaged myth and legend are a multi-billion dollar
industry (see: Riordan, Rick). Take a dash of classic literature, throw in
heaping amounts of teen angst and faux Po-Mo attitude, shake and stir with
action set pieces ripe for the Big Screen, and serve copiously at your local
Barnes and Noble. Though not taken to that extreme, and written with class and
reserve, Stewart’s novels are the progenitor of the Riordan phenomenon.
Anyway, the books themselves:
I used the adjective “murky” a few paragraphs ago, and
that best describes my thirty-five-year-old memories of them. Not crisp, clear
memories, but nebulous emotional attachments. Images laced with fear and
foreboding. The vague recollection of Merlin’s forbidding grandfather-king
slipping on spilled oil and cracking his head open, and Merlin’s slave put to
death for it. The boy’s uncle slyly inducing the lad to eat a poisoned fruit.
The ever-so-brief interlude in the forest with the hermit / teacher Galapas,
expanding the boy’s vision in countless ways. Merlin finally overcoming brutality,
savagery, and near death to wind up at the fireside next to his true father
(how that warm image stayed with me!). The larger, geopolitical jigsaw pieces
fragmented about in my recollection, such as the dragon at Vortigern’s castle,
Merlin’s deception to bring lovestruck Uther to Ygraine’s bed (and thus beget
Arthur), Morgause incestuously laying with Arthur after his first battle
success.
Thus, for distant me, the two novels morphed into one
timeless, blurry dream of incomprehensible apprehension.
Three-and-a-half decades later, a vivid laserlight has
excised those dark and dank memories.
I enjoyed the two books. Crystal Cave slightly better than Hollow Hills.
No doubt it’s the seven hundred books read in the
interim. I know that good triumphs over evil, mostly, mostly after taking a
damn hard beating. I know that now; I didn’t know that then. I know story arc,
and characterization, and plot, and setting. I have tried my own hand at them.
Stewart is a great expositor, and great dialoguist, a wizard in her own right
with the turn of a phrase. I thoroughly enjoyed travelling with Merlin as he
grew in age, stature, and power, and found his own way, and discovered (“put
himself in the path of the gods”) his charge to unite all of Britain through a
bastard like himself, a hunted helpless child name of Arthur.
Oh, and maps. Maps help immensely in fantasy books.
Don’t think the version I read in the early 80s had any. The paperbacks I just
finished printed detailed maps of post-Roman England on the first pages.
Grade: A for The
Crystal Cave. A-minus for The Hollow
Hills, for two minor points of contention. First, I found large swaths of Hills unmemorable and unremarkable –
Merlin spends years tending a shrine, trekking through snowy woods,
encountering the Old Ones, etc. And I thought the whole “origin story” and “reveal”
of Excalibur – called “Caliburn” here – something of a let-down, in that it was
at variance to what I’ve absorbed from the more traditional tales.
Still, perfect for any youngling approaching high
school age and bitten by the fantasy bug.
No comments:
Post a Comment