I was
walking Charlie Sunday morning around 8 a.m. (before the solar cauldron that is
Texas in August overwhelms my poor friend in his fur coat) and I listened to a
short video on, of all things, how to make a reading list.
Hey! I’m
quite familiar with that.
In 2012 I
made a list of Civil War books to read, and during Covid I made a list of WW II
books to read. (I chose WW II because it kinda mirrored the scary uncertainty
of that first Wu Flu month, but in the end the good guys won.) To date I’ve
read 38 Civil War and 40 WW II books, following my reading plans loosely and
flexibly.
In 2013 I
spent the first five months reading through SF author Philip Jose Farmer’s
bibliography, wading my way through fourteen of his works. The next year I read
through an H. P. Lovecraft omnibus of 23 lesser and major tales. I’ve done
similar excursions with theologian Derek Prince, SF author Robert Silverberg (who
I enjoyed much more than Farmer), and eight of thirteen novels from English writer
Bernard Cornwell’s Napoleonic saga.
Anyway, I was
interested in this YouTuber’s take. He was using “Economics” as an example –
how to create a reading list for the beginner in the field of economics.
This got
me thinking. To me, economics literally is “the dismal science.” I took Micro
and Macro 101 at Rutgers eons ago. I despised the in-the-trenches Micro but
only mildly hated the birds-eye-view Macro. Later, at night school, I had to
take one or the other again, and I have no memory of the course or my feelings
towards it (but I doubt it changed). Back in 2016 when I took a little training
course to be a tax preparer for H&R Block, I read a couple of books in the
subject, emphasizing taxes, and somewhat sorta enjoyed it. The section on the
National Economy of Thomas Sowell’s Basic Economics was tolerable, but
that could be due to Sowell’s skills as a writer and teacher.
In my educated-but-not-specialized
mind, economics is statistics mixed with Jeanne Dixon psychic fortune telling.
Statistics can be bent, warped, twisted, and extorted to tell anything you
want them to tell. Was it Mark Twain who said that thing about lies, damned
lies, and statistics? And every economist seems to have his own agenda – an
outcome or policy he wants to promote and propound that it’s almost worse than the
free-for-all melee that it the history of philosophy. That guy Thomas Friedman,
has he ever been right about anything? (Honestly, I don’t know, but I think I
read a few things over the years about his less-than-stellar predictions that
made me write the previous sentence.)
Hopper’s relationship
with economics boils down to a handful of simple but intuitive aphorisms:
* The more
you tax something, the less you get. This applies to people’s earnings, too.
* Trickle
down economics work more often than it doesn’t (like, 60% of the time,
depending on the state of the economy). Still, the best way to fire up the
economy is to cut taxes.
* The U.S.
tax system screws the middle class – and by that I mean it does absolutely
nothing to help grow it; it’s almost downright nasty to its millions of
members.
* The Democrats
will mug you in broad daylight while the Republicans will only pickpocket you when
you feel safest in a crowd.
* The less
government is involved in the economy, the better the economy will hum along.
* Government
programs NEVER go away.
* The economy
is a fragile spider web – one part snapping at the fringe can spell disaster to
the entire latticework.
* The government
does not create jobs. Rich people with capital do.
* Capitalism
is the worst economic system devised by man – except for all the others.
* Firms
should only be interested in profit, not social engineering, not discrimination,
not DEI, not pandering to (leftist) causes. When the GPS goes off of profit,
you wind up in a lake with Michael Scott.
* Stimulus
checks have zero economic value.
* Bubbles
burst. When everyone’s talking about one thing, you’re in a bubble. Hear that,
A.I.?
Sigh.
Okay, I see what I just did to myself. Now I’m going to have to ride out the
rest of the year working a reading list of books for people who hate economics
but now feel the need to study the dismal science.
No comments:
Post a Comment