Think for a moment of how we experience the world. It’s through the senses, right? We interact with our surroundings via sight, hearing, touch, taste, and smell. At this very moment I feel the hard wood of my desk beneath my arms and the springy motion of the plastic of the keyboard. I hear the clack-clack of the keys as I type. The cold basement air gently stirs against my checks. Can’t really smell, because I’m all stuffed up. And I can still taste residual soy milk in my mouth from the bowl of cereal I had fifteen minutes ago.
This is my phenomenal world. Philosopher Charles Peirce coined a word for it: the Phaneron.
This is neat because it implies a world beyond the phaneron. An anti-phaneron. Or, an ultra-phaneron. How about a super-phaneron, a hyper-phaneron, an über-phaneron? What would a sub-phaneron imply? An inter-phaneron?
(Words are neat; prefixes are neater.)
Anyway, here’s a nifty analogy for thinking about phaneron and whatever it is that exists beyond the phaneron.
Those of you somewhat knowledgeable in philosophy will recall Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. Guy’s chained down in a cave with a blazing bonfire behind him, and can only stare at the wall in front of him. Between fire and guy can be anything: a dancing girl, a hibernating bear, Achilles with a spear, whatever. All the guy can see is the shadows cast on the wall in front of him by the fire and the girl, bear, warrior, etc. Plato created this analogy to explain our experience of reality.
Now for something similar, but different.
Imagine your universe to be a giant, translucent box. That means light from outside the box can pass through but without any real clarity. Additionally, let’s say there are birds flying around outside the box. All you can see are the blurry shadows that fall on the top and sides of your giant universe-box. With me? You probably see where this is going. Your phaneron is the box, and “reality” to you are those blurry bird shadows you can see.
Now, take the box and shrink it down. Shrink it down to your skin.
Try to think about your phaneron and the hyper-phaneron in this new context.
Pretty neat, huh?
[Giant box shrunken down taken from Experience and Prediction, by Hans Reichenbach]
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
The philosophical implications of Plato's Cave have always intrigued me. Do I see the world only as obtuse shadows, or am I cognizant of the true reality? Obviously others have the same questions. Just remember, if/when we can see the true reality of the world, it is our obligation to drag others in the cave away from the fire/shadows and bring them to see the true existence that we live. Only then can the world be changed for the better. Funny, 2000 years later and we're still in the same place.
-UJ
What if there were a hundred chained prisoners, and one managed to escape. When he turned and saw the girl, bear, or Achilles, what would happen? Would he know what the girl, bear, or Achilles was, knowing them previously only from their shadows? Or would he instantly go insane? Or would the other prisoners kill him for disrupting their comfortable world view? Or ...
Ah, questions with no answers. Plato's analogy assumes that once you are shown that your original view of the world was only "shadows" or, better yet, distorted specters of the truth, you will recognize this and ultimately accept the true/clear reality of the world. The problem, as you have questioned, is the perception by "the others" that the light/fire was so brilliant that you (your vision of the world) are so different that their only explanation is that you went insane. Plato states that it is our moral obligation to drag the others, no matter how much they resist, further into the cave, behind the fire, and make them see the reality that is the true world.
In our world, when you try to make others see the reality of things, you are right. Disrupt their comfortable existence and suffer the consequences. Lincoln dragged an entire country from behind the fire to expose the injustices and horrors of slavery, look how he was rewarded. Is that why we have so few true leaders?
Besides the current book that I'm reading, there are ALWAYS a copy of The Prince and Tzun Tzu on my night stand, maybe there should also be a copy of The Republic. I feel a trip to Barnes and Noble later in the day is probable. Your post has me thinking like an enlightened man once again, the Jesuits are smiling.
-UJ
Post a Comment